Trump, Porn, Stormy Daniels, and the Fake Liberal Outrage

Liberals are morally “outraged,”, “offended,” and ” perturbed” by a billionaire businessman having a one-time fling with a pornographic actress, Stephanie Clifford (AKA Stormy Daniels).  In October, 2016, Trump’s lawyer, Michael Cohen, paid Daniels $130k as part of a non-disclosure agreement so that she wouldn’t spill the beans on the alleged affair.  Now, Daniels wants to tell all, claiming the agreement is void because Trump never signed it.

But before 2016, Daniels had already discussed her affair with Trump:

“[The sex] was textbook generic, she said in an interview with US magazine InTouch magazine in 2011. He wasn’t like Fabio or anything. He wasn’t trying to have, like, porn sex.

“It was nothing crazy. It was one position, what you would expect someone his age to do.”

And now there is buzz of the possibility of the existence of “confidential information” (texts, images, etc.) pertaining to the affair, since the agreement required her to turnover any such information.  Being that ten years has transpired since the affair, and nothing has been leaked, the likelihood that there are crude images or texts, is slim.  But if Daniels really does have something more on Trump, and she wins her suit to have the NDA declared void, she’ll have a chance to release any salacious texts or images.  (Basically, after this rodeo, she would have to “put up or shut up,” otherwise it’s just confirmation of a publicity stunt).

Now that we’ve established  that the affair likely happened, it’s intriguing that liberals are so intent in manufacturing a scandal, when their own actually engaged in far worse scandals that violated the public trust.

  • Bill Clinton would routinely summon Monica Lewinsky to the Oval Office for oral sex;  he was President, she was an intern, and the outcome resulted in him being disbarred after he had the audacity to lie under oath about it.  (He was never convicted by the Senate, and refused to resign).
  • Anthony Weiner (AKA Carlos Danger), was sexting women, some of whom were teens, sending lewd pictures of his genitalia to them via social media sites such as twitter, and snapchat.  He did this during his term in Congress, and when running for NYC Mayor.
  •  Eliot Spitzer paid up to $80,000 for prostitutes over a period of several years – first while he was attorney general, and later as governor.  Yes, he was linked to a prostitution ring as “Client 9” scheduled to meet with a prostitute who’s part of the ring, Emperors Club VIP.  Ironically, while he was meeting with prostitutes, he was prosecuting these prostitution rings as the Attorney General.  (He later got his own show on CNN).

weiner

Trump likely had a sexual encounter with a pornographic actress, which later turned platonic.  It was a one-time fling:  the alleged sexual encounter occurred in 2006, and didn’t happen again. It didn’t involve an intern in the oval office;  it didn’t involve underage children;  and he wasn’t linked to a prostitution ring while simultaneously prosecuting those rings.  In other words, he didn’t abuse the public trust, or engage in criminal behavior.  He wasn’t even a politician at the time.

We’ve heard from Daniels how the encounter went, and yet some are eager to get “texts” and “calls” stemming from the affair for the sole purpose of embarrassing a sitting U.S. President.  Maybe those people, for our sake, should suggest serious policy proposals, instead of indulge in their fascination with Trump’s past sex life.  Their hatred and desire to embarrass a sitting President is packaged as “moral outrage,” when their own did far worse, and were treated with kid gloves, and afforded second chances.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Advertisements

1 Comment

  1. I don’t think it is so much a “moral outrage” as it is that Trump states he is a Republican and ranted about “family values” when it is quite obvious he has none. The same goes for the democrats with Clinton, et al. It is the fact that they are all so danged hypocritical. What is so blasted hard about telling the truth? It is the fact that people surrounding him are so repugnant, willing to lie at the drop of a hat. It is the fact that when people lie to others the inference is “you’re too stupid to see the truth so I can get away with it”. it is maddening to hear the lies, the obfuscations, the proclamations of innocence from those who are so obviously not. It is both sides, both liberal and conservative that seem to think because they have been elected they can do whatever they please. The Stormy Daniels kerfuffle is just ONE MORE THING that he and his minions are lying about. THAT is where the outrage comes in.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.